Forums › Forums › General chatter › NZIHL.com Home Page
- This topic has 18 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by vpatrol.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 27, 2009 at 11:27 am #13202Jofa playaMember
are u joking vince u must be screwed in the head, because as u know the stampede got 53mins to the devils 16 so it must be obvious for a smart as guy like u to figure out that jerome must’ve been 7th man for the devils not for stampede {Snip}
{Mods: Don’t be rude about other forum members thanks}
July 28, 2009 at 5:40 am #13203vpatrolMemberas plod said, the actual man advantage was negligible compared to the actual minutes recorded. We just didn’t get 10 min penalties. Stampede had the only 5 on 3 of the game and they got it late. They also scored on it. For all the guys in the box in the end, the game finished with 5 on 5. What deserved to be called was called for the most part.
Sometimes a team is penalized more than the other. It’s not always because the ref is in our pockets, its sometimes because they deserved more penalties. Maybe we got away with a few and maybe Stampede did too. I can’t say without being biased. The only one that I saw that was really complained about was Glassy not getting a penalty shot. Got a penalty but not a shot. Could have gone either way but I was focussing on the puck so I didn’t get as good a look as I would have liked.
I think we were better on the day though. On saturday, Stampede was better. Both teams got the points they deserved.
That being said, I question the wisdom of accusing the ref of being a 7th man while the game is still on. If I was a ref, I can’t imagine being very sympathetic to a team who accused me of cheating. Not the best strategy and frankly deserving of another penalty (which he didn’t get). Regardless, we have the refs we have, won’t change this year. Move on. The senior guys on stampede have I’m sure.
July 28, 2009 at 9:18 am #13204kelf6966Member"vpatrol":1b1t6d0u wrote:That being said, I question the wisdom of accusing the ref of being a 7th man while the game is still on. If I was a ref, I can’t imagine being very sympathetic to a team who accused me of cheating. Not the best strategy and frankly deserving of another penalty (which he didn’t get). Regardless, we have the refs we have, won’t change this year. Move on. The senior guys on stampede have I’m sure.
[/quote:1b1t6d0u]Who accused the ref of cheating while the game was on?? That’s just Dumb, I know words were said after the game but that is sport.
Any questioning of the ref on the ice except by the Captain or Assistants should not be acceptable and dealt with quickly, this bloody game goes on too long as it is!July 28, 2009 at 10:22 am #13205vpatrolMemberRef was told that he was the devils best player. That’s implying cheating on behalf of ref favoring a team.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.