Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
which is my point to if known a post on a hockey can issue carrys more weight or not depending on age, club and level played. Just like your Obama thing.
If Bonazzo isnt playing there big D #27 Koopmans has gone home and chambilian there captian out for the games against Thunder, and Thunder has full roster I think there is a very good chance of winning, also the want to win will have a factor.
Thunder will have to keep a couple on the leash not to give away penaltys
Big showdown looking forward to seeing the results
even if people are known wont stop the abuse by eggs thats why you boys are there t remove content which is all good by me and seems you let the right amount though
There are benefits to being known and unknown for insistance the comments i have made on this site have been from what i have written and any pre-determined slant because my name, team, and club are withheld there is no taint from any of those things. I might be trying to veiw my point ad it is taken the wrong due to the club i may be from.
Having people known (even though some are) may take away the veiw point depending age, club, level of hockey played for example i wont write his name due to the rules but when he posts stuff about games i know his experinece is limited
Being known would help some out o the point they are trying to get across too, it is a shame about the few who ruin it for the majority although i am not a against coming out just enjoying being anoymous, if the rules change guess ill have to strap on some balls and come out of the closet
Admirals goalie also has been standing on his head, Mike has alot of experiance which cant be discounted, both teams have equal goalies it will depend very much on which team can structure there defense first which will allow the transition to offense more quickly and take some pressure of the goalies.
Azzy,
You call how you see the game really depending on which side your on even if you are not looking through the rose tinted glass. In any game a ref is going to make a bad call, a good call and and miss a few which generally you watch and remember the missed calls predominantly on your own team, im sure if you posed that question to a stampede player i sure he could rattle of a few missed on the thunder.
i like the reffing this year so far it has allowed to more flow into the game, however i think some of the players attitudes have also changed which allows the refs to let the game flow. In my view if a ref has to think about it then its probley not a penalty
We have to be carefull what is moderated as contreversal brings people to the site, two sides to any topic is the spice to reading this forum. Singling out one player many times is just slagging, but what of the coach in Queenstown with the netting stuff? i found that complelling reading and love the banter between teams which flow ver to this site, like “did you see or hear what that player did” which is the basis of starting a mean as forum debate.
Be wary of to much censorship you will have insurgant/terriost sites popping up everywhere to get the truth out, probley not we are not in Iraq but i hope you get my point
I do agree with moving the site so it is individually stand alone from any club or association so the freedom of good forum banter may prevail.
pysical play, bang and crash, chess, systems or the refs who won on the day?? on another note not bagging but who seen van Pouke on TV he looked like Neo out of the matrix, nice coat
