Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
"vpatrol":atjboxu3 wrote:I think you misunderstand the context Marc’s quote.
[/quote:atjboxu3]I think your mum misunderstood the context of Marc’s quote.
Yeah, I went there.
"rookie#19":3dqp6yfv wrote:God that was well done.. do you get it? Hairy-One (because it sounds like “Erewhon”, but then its dedicated to Blake who is hairy, so he is the hairy-one). Hope everyone got that well thought out joke.[/quote:3dqp6yfv]
I think I see what you did there, but could you explain it for us again. Not cause i didn’t get it, just cause I like the sound of your voice, stefan. except it’s not really your voice. It’s more like your binary code. So really, I like your binary code. Sounds a bit dirty doesn’t it?
"Chin Strap":6o90eqzl wrote:poor little bugger
[/quote:6o90eqzl]Apparently he’s ok. I talked to some of the admirals boys at the rink today, and they said that he’d had a back/neck injury earlier on and the doctors had told him that if he injured his back again anytime soon they were to take it very seriously.
He’s in a lot of pain, but is up and walking, so permanent damage is unlikely. Pretty fortunate.
P.S. What was with that guy hassling the ref? Was a missed call worth a match penalty?
P.P.S. Welcome back guest. Behave yourself now!
Thunder are going to win one, dammit!
[font=Verdana:3k2fj3d5][color=red:3k2fj3d5][size=140:3k2fj3d5]Thor, God of Thunder, Hear My Call![/size:3k2fj3d5][/color:3k2fj3d5][/font:3k2fj3d5]
"Ryan":1gbwjaj4 wrote:"Chris":1gbwjaj4 wrote:Does anyone know what the justification for the rule is? I’ve never been clear on that.
[/quote:1gbwjaj4]No idea. I think a bunch of little boys are just scared to be beaten by girls and so instituted a rule to stop them.
[/quote:1gbwjaj4]
To be honest I think that’s quite unlikely. between players of comparable skill, women are unlikely to physically dominate men. An example would be Kara vs Myself. Similar level of hockey skill (Maybe?) but somehow the thought of her hitting me doesn’t fill me with fear. (no offence kara – it’s just that compared to me you’re not very big
” title=”Cheesy” />)No, there has to be a better reason than that.
"Ryan":xbiyxw38 wrote:Perhaps the DIHA should add another rule to compensate for that as they’ve done in the past. The CIHA have done the same thing. It’s a retarded rule anyway.[/quote:xbiyxw38]
Does anyone know what the justification for the rule is? I’ve never been clear on that.
Well, I for one am glad we all seem to be supporting different teams. Preaching to the converted gets a little tiresome after a while!
As for stampede vs red devils, I’m going to have to say red devils by a hair. The first time I saw the devils play this season I noticed how strong their forward line was, and the stats back that up.
Of course, I would like stampede to win, and they definitely have a good chance of taking the devils to school, but I think if I had to put money on it then Canterbury would be my pick.
[quote:vbz94az1]Im going to stick my head on the line here and say and make a broad generalisation statement based on some vague assumptions
Cattleprod is cowgirls boyfriend[/quote:vbz94az1]HAHA!
Peter, thanks heaps for these photos! It’s great that you continue to put your time and effort into hockey.
If you’d like, I can embed them in a post in the photos and videos forum.
"Azzy77":2la0vkuc wrote:Yea…The weekend was a shame… and rather indicative of the Thunders season to date.
The puck bounces the right way for admirals they take advantage of it. The puck bounces for thunder they don’t capitalise.And at this level that is the difference. Honestly the thunder where just as much in that game as the Admirals were if not more at some points. But the way they took there opportunities was the difference. Although Thunder scoring 4 goals on Mike Parsons in under 2 minutes was a good sign for the up coming weekend.
The bounces also cost us in every other game I have seen with the exception of the first one against Canterbury. Don’t get me wrong I don’t think we deserved to win those games, just i don’t think we deserved to lose that badly.
[/quote:2la0vkuc]Well 7-5 is a decent scoreline, looks like Thunder are at least getting some shots on goal. It would be nice to see a win though!
” title=”Cheesy” />One thing I noticed about the first Thunder vs Red Devils game down here in Dunedin was that the Red Devils defensemen were not pushed at all. I think that was primarily an artifact of the fact that the Thunder just didn’t seem to be able to control the puck up the ice the way that the Red Devils did, and consequently didn’t put on the kind of offensive pressure needed to really show the Red Devils’ defensive capabilities.
As I put it to one of my friends who was also at the game, “This is called dump and chase, except there’s an awful lot of dump and not a lot of chase”.
"vpatrol":3ef3jiz4 wrote:"cowgirl":3ef3jiz4 wrote:Oh, come on. You’re just put out that Canty’s only got your vote!
Remember, it’s just personal opinion ….I think people aren’t sure who’s going to win out of Red Devils and Stampede but are picking their ‘horse’ to be Stampede – I guess that means they WANT Stampede to win.
Yeehaaa!
” title=”Grin” />
[/quote:3ef3jiz4]Nope. If you decide one over the other, I would like to know why. Undecided doesn’t explain a clear decision!
[/quote:3ef3jiz4]I picked the Stampede ’cause their tops aren’t red. It was a tough choice.
This just in from our man in the Thunder:
4-2 Admirals.
Thunder took some stupid penalties for poor changes.
Dodgy goal allowed for Admirals, apparently.
More to come.
