Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
FlyingGeoffMember
Hi Keith
I’ld go.
Some guesswork on bergs: The tall ones, that calve off thick glaciers which end at the sea, won’t have significant flat surfaces to begin with and will probably roll over relatively frequently. The bergs that form when ice shelves break up are more raft-like, at least initially. They will need to break into much smaller pieces before losing stability and beginning to roll. Any bergs that make it to Dunedin will be these ice shelf bergs, but they could easily be non-tabular and regular rollers by the time they get here.
I’m not sure how often we will have bergs reaching us – it was a massive break off that eventually produced the small chunks that reached us in 2006, 11,000 sq kms (bigger than the one you mention Keith?), and it took 4 years for it to break up and have bits reach us.
The ice will be fresh water – to produce significant ice shelf thickness, massive amounts of snow has to compress on top of any sea-ice. I am quite prepared to believe that any ice that reaches us will be hard and smooth by the time it gets here. As you say Keith – the action of wind, rain, melt and refreeze will have removed any poorly compressed snow long ago and smoothed it off.
But it will still be a crap-shoot as to whether any berg that makes it this far will present a big enough flat surface. And I think the chances of another berg visit might be small. (NIWA says bergs were last seen off the NZ mainland, also from Dunedin, in 1931.) Happy to be proved wrong though, and maybe things are warming up.
Wiki says the “US National Ice Centre” tracks any Antarctic berg longer than 20km. Someone with a faster connection than me could see if they will tell us of any possible visit candidates.
April 22, 2008 at 8:22 pm in reply to: Umpires for extra Bulls v Bullfrogs game Wed 23rd April #8516FlyingGeoffMemberThanks Jason. I would prefer to have you guys controlling the game given that you will cover the lining as well and I spoke to you first.
So apologies for giving you the nod initially Graham, I presume you will still have a good evening beating up the Beasts.Jason, I have no way of confirming with Jack or Callan unless they respond here so, if possible, could you remind them. Thanks again.
April 22, 2008 at 7:26 am in reply to: Umpires for extra Bulls v Bullfrogs game Wed 23rd April #8513FlyingGeoffMemberYes, thanks. Excuse my lack of Forum-lore, but, is that you Graham P-B? (This is Dave Patchett by the way.)
And so now we just need a couple of linesmen. Don’t be shy! Keeping up with the Bulls moving the puck around will not be stressful.
April 22, 2008 at 6:33 am in reply to: Umpires for extra Bulls v Bullfrogs game Wed 23rd April #8511FlyingGeoffMemberHi Jason and Jack. And er Callan as well maybe. Further to our discussions around the rotten fish, are you the Beasts players who would like to line and/or umpire tomorrow night? (Puck drop at 7pm.)
April 21, 2008 at 10:26 pm in reply to: Umpires for extra Bulls v Bullfrogs game Wed 23rd April #8509FlyingGeoffMemberWhat do you expect with an average of 0.027 posts per day?
FlyingGeoffMemberHi Graham
Count the Patchetts (that’s 3) in for next Wednesday night.
FlyingGeoffMemberHi Graham
Dave P, Steph and Nick are all happy to see their names on the list. Thanks and see you on Wednesday.
Dave.
FlyingGeoffMemberThanks Graham
Dave P, Stef and Nick are in for the Wed night game. Is that a bear majority at this point?
Could you just confirm the puck drop time?
-
AuthorPosts