Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
"Azzy77":6czg6e0k wrote:Also I am not sure why the officials deemed it necessary to tackle the thunder players so often? Mike Ceelan took out our Dman in the first period, and Paul Scott got Damo quite good in the 3rd. Perhaps I haven’t read my rulebook lately but I don’t think that’s how you officiate a game.
[/quote:6czg6e0k]I think I evened that up when I got in the way of one of the Stampede players (Rout?) when he was trying to back away from the blue line to cover Paris and it ended up being a 2 on 1 for Thunder.
Thunder looked better in the 3 on 3 than Stampede. I’m not sure if Stampede scored, but Thunder certainly did during that five minutes. You’ll probably never get to play 3 on 3 again however.
Some people might think that you’re not taking it seriously Aaron.
I thought Spiers was a significant difference maker. Couple of very accurate wrist shots that beat Parry where he had no right to score.
"Ryan":1tlhag5f wrote:Lol, no. But playing a hockey game with open entry and multiple cameras pointing at him was probably a good hint that his game may be broadcast
” title=”Tongue” />
[/quote:1tlhag5f]I dunno how Stampede coaches view it, but Thunder coaches have previously asked not to have footage of their games put up.
I suspect all NZIHL games will ban this soon, if it’s not banned already on the entry conditions. Once sky tv gets ownership rights to broadcast footage they won’t want people filming and putting up anywhere footage of the games.
Did you check with Aston if he wanted his strengths and weaknesses broadcast for all the other teams to see?
Duncan Sykes had the misfortune to block a shot with his mouth and lost a tooth on the ice, plus others apparently bent but still in.
Better game all round than yesterday I thought.
Vince you need to give us some more about the Canterbury-Admirals games. You would have got great odds for two admirals wins, how did that happen? Canterbury not playing well, admirals stepping up, goalie having a mare/other goalie doing some head standing?
Penalties were majors – 5+ automatic game misconduct. Yes, should have played 5 on 5, we discussed this after the game.
From the case book:
“1. A3 – 5 minutes + GM at 3:00 B8 – 5 minutes + GM at 3:00
At 3:00 teams play 5 on 5
Teams do not need to put substitute players in the penalty bench because A3
and B8 are out of the game”TV3 story about ice hockey and the national league that was on the other night:
Paul at least got taken down by a player, I did my typical unassisted trick. Hit by the puck twice, once was my fault for having my skates the wrong way, the other one a Thunder player fired it straight into my thigh. Glad I had my pads on. And I got in the way of a Stampede player coming back from the blue line.
Hard game all around. Broke up three tussles. 3 on 3 was crazy.
Dunedin was 7-4 to Stampede. Dunedin 1-0 up at the end of the 1st, but then a horror second period – 4 straight goals, including a 3 on 5 short handed goal.
Four players sent from the ice for fighting in the third – Frear and Watson from Thunder, Spiers and one other from Stampede.
No it was arranged. I just didn’t know it had changed so when I found out Phil was away I had an interesting 20 minutes
” title=”Smiley” />
