vpatrol

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,100 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: NZIHL 2011 #16563
    vpatrol
    Member

    shakespeare knew the rules prior to breaking them. 

    in reply to: Canada vs. USA…in New Zealand? #10386
    vpatrol
    Member

    not associated with Moose means not wearing Moose jersey’s but Moose is promoting it and recruiting the players according to their website. 

    I don’t think a throw together team is good competition.  We need structured teams who play together regularly.

    in reply to: Women in Iceland Div IV #16533
    vpatrol
    Member

    Great article.

    in reply to: Women in Iceland Div IV #16529
    vpatrol
    Member

    awesome job ladies!  Definately the class of the competition.

    in reply to: Women in Iceland Div IV #16526
    vpatrol
    Member

    South Africa goes down 7-2 to mighty NZ!  SA barely had any shots.  Well done!

    in reply to: Dunedin Thunder trials #16536
    vpatrol
    Member

    either that or the Thunder scouting staff has been busy doing their rounds and have submitted their reports?

    in reply to: Canada vs. USA…in New Zealand? #10374
    vpatrol
    Member
    "Active":3tu52ofv wrote:
    No one is asking you to go see them play. people may well go along and see an exciting game and be none the wiser. they may be dissapointed but so what? theres to many armchair critics around who are willing to beat  an opportunity into a negative thing and thats whats happening here
    [/quote:3tu52ofv]

    We don’t have to go to the game to care.  We are on the forums and at the rink doing things that have nothing to do with our own playing because we give a damn about the game in NZ.  Anything that could put a massive dent in the games future is of a concern to us.  I personally won’t sit back and watch.  If the promoters were willing to actually work with the hockey community instead of trying to convince the naysayers that they are 100% right, then we wouldn’t be negative.  Plus I don’t like being lied to and I don’t like the promoters assuming I’m too dumb to notice.

    in reply to: Canada vs. USA…in New Zealand? #10370
    vpatrol
    Member

    Thirteen beat me to it.  I’ll send an apology to the promoters should the games prove to be all they claim however there is risk of damage to the game and its fragile but growing reputation in NZ.  Two guys who know squat about the game are wielding a heck of a lot of public perception power.   

    in reply to: Women in Iceland Div IV #16523
    vpatrol
    Member

    wicked job!

    in reply to: Canada vs. USA…in New Zealand? #10363
    vpatrol
    Member

    I like foam fingers and Prince William references.  Not sure where they got the american hockey reference from….Kate Middleton.  Can’t recall the fireworks displays at the dozen NHL games I’ve been at.  Perhaps it had something to do with an indoor venue….2nd in line to the throne.  Wonder where the 100 million came from.  Promoters must have friends at westpac to get a line of credit that big.  Or maybe they included the cost of the arena’s in their figures…Pike River…Victoria…Queensland….lost puppies  etc etc. 

    in reply to: Whistle blowing #16508
    vpatrol
    Member

    I thought this was a whistle blower post.  I wanted to know who was tattling on who.  Instead its only about dirty ol refereeing.  Disappointed.

    in reply to: International Ice Hockey Game level #16488
    vpatrol
    Member

    Their “charity” auction seems to have been pulled by trademe.  Appears to have been a low down attempt at advertising their game in chch.

    in reply to: International Ice Hockey Game level #16486
    vpatrol
    Member

    skill flux unit per dollar is gonna be pretty low compared to nzihl then isn’t it Chris?

    in reply to: Canada vs. USA…in New Zealand? #10351
    vpatrol
    Member

    how else will the bottom half teams get wins?  Someone has to keep Chicago and Detroit from getting the number 1 draft pick.

    in reply to: Canada vs. USA…in New Zealand? #10348
    vpatrol
    Member
    "Kyle":2o1k0qh2 wrote:
    I doubt it will be 3 x 20. They’ve discussing using different times – it might be 3×15 or 4 x 10 or something.
    [/quote:2o1k0qh2]

    So charging NHL prices (top market prices) but you only get potentially 66-75% of the game time?  Count me in especially cause my favorite nhl superstar will be on the ice for 50% of the game.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,100 total)