vpatrol

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 751 through 765 (of 1,100 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: NZIHL.com Home Page #13201
    vpatrol
    Member
    "kelf6966":11rismqc wrote:
    "vpatrol":11rismqc wrote:
    I didn’t see any major mistakes.
    [/quote:11rismqc]

    No surpises there you didn’t see 2 pucks in the first, 1 in the 2nd and 1 in the third either <img decoding=” title=”Smiley” />
    [/quote:11rismqc]

    I didn’t see the second goal but I saw the other 3. 

    in reply to: best goalie NZIHL “09” #12956
    vpatrol
    Member

    we had a dedicated shot taker.  Not even taking numbers, just location.  I suspect most of the missed shots are the scrambles.  After the first shot, they look down to record and miss 2 3 and 4.  They try though.

    in reply to: 2009 Round 6 Stampede vs Red Devils #12728
    vpatrol
    Member
    "Jofa playa":1je2p5h7 wrote:
    it was jerome reffing, i was there in chch for a meeting went to the games all i can say is that chch goalies are so average same with that new guy playing for them i think he’s called jerome, the dicipline was lacking in both sides but it was pretty even between teams but some how stampede had atleast 3 times as many minutes in the bin, especially at the end of the game stampede having 5 in the bin chch having 3,
    [/quote:1je2p5h7]

    Shame you weren’t playing.  You sound awesome.

    in reply to: best goalie NZIHL “09” #12954
    vpatrol
    Member

    stats are notoriously bad in the nzihl.  Not only on the scoresheet but on the website too.  Our own stat takers down south had about 40 more shots per game then the official scoresheet.  Bless those ladies in dunedin though, they try hard.

    in reply to: best goalie NZIHL “09” #12952
    vpatrol
    Member

    I believe you have it the other way around.  Devils outshot the Stampede badly according to the scoresheet on saturday (I only looked at sheet briefly).  Sundays game had stampede taking 36 and devils taking 33. 

    in reply to: 2009 Round 6 Stampede vs Red Devils #12723
    vpatrol
    Member

    whatever.  I’m done talking about it.  Stampede won on saturday.  Devils won on sunday.  Both teams deserved their win.

    in reply to: 2009 Round 6 Stampede vs Red Devils #12720
    vpatrol
    Member
    "cowgirl":12jk191h wrote:
    "vpatrol":12jk191h wrote:
    lots of guys in the bin but the game still ended 5 on 5.  Scrap down in my end.  Refs were pretty even handed although I’m sure there will be complaints as always.
    [/quote:12jk191h]

    Yep, really even 53mins vs 16mins penalties
    [/quote:12jk191h]

    How about you take away the 10 minute ones and replace with that 2 minutes served as far as man advantage.  A hit to the head is a hit to the head.  You hit to the head, you go to the box, you feel shame.

    in reply to: NZIHL.com Home Page #13198
    vpatrol
    Member

    score sheet may say something different.  minutes weren’t lopsided.  Stampede scored on a 5 on 3 to make it closer.  Maybe Jerome was the 7th man for Southern on that one??  Refs did a decent job and I’m one who has written letters in the past complaining of refs.  I didn’t see any major mistakes.

    in reply to: best goalie NZIHL “09” #12949
    vpatrol
    Member
    "NZblackice":5laghun7 wrote:
    Justin Findlay was in net for the ‘Dev’s on saturday and Vince was in on Sunday. Thomas Gobiel played both games for Stampede. On sunday, Vince and Gobiel were tested right from the start with 5 goals in the first 4 minutes. Good solid goal tending from all 3 goalies though.
    [/quote:5laghun7]

    Can you not mention the first 4 minutes?  I still have trouble sleeping.

    in reply to: 2009 Round 6 Stampede vs Red Devils #12714
    vpatrol
    Member

    there were tonnes of cheap shots and not just devils.  Stacey and Braden were in form as expected.  It’s going to happen when two physical teams play.  Nobody got hurt and the penalties were pretty even.  Therefore the scorelines reflected the play and not the penalty box for both games.

    in reply to: NZIHL.com Home Page #13195
    vpatrol
    Member
    "kelf6966":2r7adk98 wrote:
    “The Canterbury Red Devils Chris Eaden – 30 Points in 6 games. Can he be stopped?”
    as quoted on the front page of NZIHL.com

    Short Answer: Yip

    Long Answer: Yip he can!

    Ask the ref if it was legal or not – really doesn’t matter now does it, well done guys, to have had to play seven on five most of the last 10min sounds like some pretty solid defense – which if you believe what you read here in the forum, is what the Stampede are lacking  <img decoding=” title=”Smiley” />  Demonic lol

    [/quote:2r7adk98]

    Can he be stopped?

    Short answer- yes
    Long answer- yes, but not for very long.  He’s baaaacccckkkk! 

    in reply to: 2009 Round 6 Stampede vs Red Devils #12707
    vpatrol
    Member

    lots of guys in the bin but the game still ended 5 on 5.  Scrap down in my end.  Refs were pretty even handed although I’m sure there will be complaints as always.

    in reply to: NZIHL.com Home Page #13191
    vpatrol
    Member
    "kelf6966":8laezrl3 wrote:
    Surpose it depends which team you support!
    [/quote:8laezrl3]

    there weren’t any penalties called against us or the stampede that weren’t actually penalties.  Blame the refs if you want.  You must have been there and had a better view than us.

    in reply to: 2009 Round 6 Stampede vs Red Devils #12701
    vpatrol
    Member

    1-1 after 1st (stampede scored on a 3 on 0.  Devils on a scramble in front)
    3-1 after 2nd
    3-2 in the end.  Eaden scored with about 1 minute to go. 

    We just didn’t show up and play.  Stampede beat us fair and square.  Refs were fine.  They let the game play.  Penalities were pretty even.  We’ll see what tomorrow brings.  I’ll reserve judgement until then.

    in reply to: 2009 Round 6 Stampede vs Red Devils #12695
    vpatrol
    Member

    still 0-0 but Stampede are due for an injection of fresh legs tomorrow.  Some Tekapo boys fresh off an Erewhon Cup win I hear.  Canadian accents.

Viewing 15 posts - 751 through 765 (of 1,100 total)